Annotations: Petition (Chapter 27)

I’m not much of an audiobook listener. The only time audiobooks work for me is when I’m doing something that occupies my hands and immediate attention, but the work is not cognitively demanding enough to occupy most of my brain. Like cleaning. Or highway driving. Otherwise, my mind tends to wander off after a few sentences and I inevitably end up constantly rewinding.

In addition, audiobook production is expensive. The standard minimum SAG-AFTRA union rate to hire a professional narrator is $250 USD per finished hour of audio. More experienced narrators charge significantly more. Pace varies according to the individual narrator and manuscript, but as a general guide, 8,000–10,000 words translates to roughly 1 finished hour of audio. At approximately 115,000 words long, an audiobook of Petition would come in at anywhere between 11.5 and 14 hrs (the final run time is 13 hrs and 43 mins) or $2,875–$3,500 USD. Using today’s exchange rate of 1 AUD = 0.66 USD, that meant the starting price tag to produce an audiobook of Petition came in somewhere around $4,400–$5,300 AUD mark!

…yeah.

If it had not been for: a) the generous 2023 cash grant I received from the Indie Fantasy Fund; and b) a “Hail Mary” source of personal funding that came through last minute, I wouldn’t’ve been able to hire Emily Woo Zeller to narrate Petition.

Needless to say, when I was writing and revising this book, I didn’t really consider how the story would come across when narrated; I was focused on strengthening emotional arcs, eliminating repetitive beats and word choices, and concentrating on the rhythm, prosody, and flow of the prose. Improving those things typically also improves the experience for audiobook listeners—if a sentence reads well on the page, it generally also reads well spoken aloud—except for scenes where the medium of delivery significantly affects how much information can be conveyed in a single line.

Like scenes with high stakes, emotionally charged dialogue.

The core of this chapter is the clash between Rahelu and Lhorne regarding her choice of House, a conflict centered in their differing experiences and worldviews. It’s about 1,660 words long, beginning on page 349 in the retail hardcover and coming to a crux on page 353.

An interesting exercise I like to do when considering whether the balance of a scene is off: I go through the text and highlight with specific, assigned colors to differentiate the various components:

  • Dialogue (green): defined as all direct forms of communication between characters, which includes things like telepathy and written letters.
  • Action (red): defined as characters acting upon (or being acted upon by) their environment/others, including phenomena like magic and whatever else is directly observable by the viewpoint.
  • Introspection (blue): defined as any personal interjections, opinions and/or interpretations of dialogue or action from the viewpoint character.

Here’s what this scene looks like after doing the highlighting exercise:

Note the high proportion of red (action, ~745 words/45%) and blue (introspection, ~425 words/25%) there is relative to the green (dialogue, ~500 words/30%). In the audiobook, the scene runs from 13:05:50 to 13:17:17. Using the proportions from the highlighting exercise as an approximation, it means we’ve effectively got a 4-minute exchange stretched out over nearly 13 minutes. Mostly, that’s due to how prose functions as a medium; dialogue needs to be supplemented with action and introspection in order to convey the fullness of what’s going on in the scene. In film or theatre, however, this would be done through the set design and by the performance of the actor/s.

So what does that mean for audiobooks?

Well, some action and introspection is still necessary, because we don’t have a set and we can’t see the narrator’s facial expressions, body language, and physical actions. We do, however, get character voice, tone, inflection, and more, through the choices the narrator makes in how to deliver a particular line of dialogue (Note 1) which means there are bits of text that no longer serve a purpose, as the non-verbal aspects of the dialogue are all conveyed through the narrator’s performance.

Me, replying to Emily and her audio engineer right after I finished listening to the mastered audio files: Chapter 27, my god. I wish I had written less introspection so my words can stop interrupting Emily’s amazing delivery of the characters’ dialogue.

Here’s a visual with what I wish I would’ve done differently. Yellow highlights are lines that I’d rework or outright delete for narration:

A screenshot of pages 349–353 of the Petition retail hardcover with red, blue, green, and yellow highlighted text.

Not a lot I would change—only about ~145 words (less than 9%) or so—but note the increasing amount of words highlighted in yellow as the tension climbs in the third (25/315), fourth (31/370), and final page (67/330) of the scene. I personally think it would have a huge impact on the perceived pacing and flow of the scene when you’re listening, and it’s something I’m definitely keeping in mind for future books.

As to what Rahelu does on the next page right after this scene…

My writing group was not pleased with me:

GODDAMNIT
YOU MADE ME FEEL FEELINGS
I SHIPPED
SO HARD
I HAVE Only one question




Kiss him, dammit!!! KISS HIM!

She should have KISSED LHORNE DAMMIT!!!!!

And if you felt particularly blue-balled, then maybe it’ll make you feel better to know that, ever since, half the time I post in our Discord about struggling with a scene, they now just spam writing advice like this:

Where they kiss, right????

Have them kiss and make up instead

now kiss

they kiss

If anything toss the scenes where they don’t kiss
These heroes better be smooching
Or I may have to write a strongly worded letter to the resonance guild

And memes like this:

I Bet He's Thinking About Other Women Meme: image of a couple lying awake in bed, where the woman is looking at the man, who is facing away.

Text overlaid on the woman: I bet he's thinking about other women

Text overlaid on the man: What if rahelu and lhorne had kissed?

More seriously, though, they really go all out to keep me sane. While I was struggling with alpha revisions and showing clear signs of spiralling, Dan Harris kindly took the time to give me some stellar constructive criticism:

Click here to read Dan’s suggestions

I hope you don’t mind but I’ve been thinking of the structural issues in your book and how to fix them. So I’ve written this. It’s an extra scene with Nheras (something you were thinking about) and also hopefully ties the murder plot into something more personal. Obviously it’s your book so please take it or leave it but I hope it’s helpful.

Click here for my reaction
A screenshot from Discord with the following text:
🤣 holy shit this is awesome
😆
I'm dying
This is the greatest thing ever
[Dan's @Discord] you absolute champ I'm in stitches
[Reactions: 4 😆 1 😂]
OMFG
My family's asleep you know, it's killing me not to laugh out loud

Dan is way funnier than I am without even trying.

Truly, my writing group is the best.

By the way, if you enjoyed that and you’d like to check out more of Dan’s work, he’s got an urban fantasy novella series that’s a bit like Men in Black meets Ghostbusters: office comedy edition as well as a series of very British cozy murder mysteries.


Note 1: Totally not the place for me to go into a full rant about why the “but what about accessibility for vision-impaired readers, etc” argument in favor of AI narration doesn’t hold up, but I do feel it’s important to point out the distinction between making something accessible and wanting (dare I say, to the point of entitlement) performance. If you’re interested in my thoughts, I had a longer discussion on the subject with some fellow authors over on JCM Berne’s channel. (return to text)


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *