Annotations: Petition (Chapter 25)

One thing I’ve come to slowly realize during the course of writing these annotations is how often I prefer to dramatize moments that could’ve been summarized instead.

Take the moment Rahelu turns and sees Nheras arriving. This could’ve been covered in a brief sentence:

Those 24 words do the job of conveying the physical action, with a little description thrown in to make sure we’re not in white room territory.

I don’t like it though. There’s no sense of conflict because there’s an absence of Rahelu’s interiority—the prose is trying too hard to conjure a “mental movie” by focusing on what Rahelu sees, instead of leaning into the advantage of prose as a medium, which allows us to really get inside Rahelu’s head and feel what she feels.

By this point of the story, we have a very clear idea of who Rahelu is and what her priorities are. We’ve also seen what she’s up against in the society she lives in, and there’s just the one antagonist left to face. Since I’m not in the habit of writing ineffective antagonists, I knew Nheras would “win” whatever confrontation was about to occur at the Ideth party. We’ve left the familiar environs of the Lowdocks and the Guild and entered the world of House-born society; Rahelu has no chance of beating Nheras at her own game.

At the same time, this is the end of Book 1, not the start of Book 2. Rahelu now is not the same person she was at the beginning of the book.

(Sidebar: it’s been interesting seeing reader reactions on whether they consider Rahelu to have had a character arc in this book. Outwardly, it may seem as though she hasn’t changed—though Rahelu has improved her station, she’s still impulsive and prone to anger—but while she hasn’t grown any wiser, she has developed a sense of self-worth.)

How to convey that?

Well, for starters, even though she’s making the same decision—to stand up to Nheras—she’s going about it differently. Neither character will throw a single punch but this long verbal confrontation is structured like a fight scene; when the dialogue starts, I want the exchange to be focused on the blows being dealt and which ones are landing.

So here’s what I did (the part I’ve snipped out is a long description of Nheras and how she is dressed):

Even taking just the first line on its own, this is better writing. Instead of passive reportage, we get active reaction. Rahelu’s not just standing there, watching; she’s responding to Nheras’s arrival by falling into a defensive combat stance. Not only do we have a sense of impending conflict, we also get a much clearer sense of the dynamic between these two characters.

But why keep going with all the other words?

To show an emotional arc. Rahelu sees her rival, she has an emotional reaction, she considers a course of action thanks to that emotion, begins to act on it…but then is prevented from doing so by an action from Nheras.

The verbal sparring hasn’t started yet, but the conflict has already begun.

That’s all well and good, but I’ve taken 300-something words to basically say “Nheras arrived”. The way the arc is structured is…fine, but the prose doesn’t go deep enough. There’s still a sense of distance present.

Here’s the same moment in the published version:

Anything that could be deleted without lessening the emotional arc, I deleted. Anything that could be said in fewer words and retain/intensify the emotional impact, I changed.

When I finished line edits on this section, I distinctly remember sitting back, mind-blown by how something significantly shorter can read so much better.

It was also the first time I could articulate why.

A Discord screenshot dated 13/5/2022, 10:46 am. Text reads:

I think the key is arcs. Arcs everywhere. The first version is fine, it gives you a sense of how Rahelu's feeling. But the second version is better, because there's a clear arc: Rahelu sees Nheras all dressed up, the thought of pushing Nheras over crosses her mind, she connects it to her desire for revenge, wants it, acknowledges she wants it, starts going for it and then stops, because Nheras has moved
And then cutting out a lot of the filler words and asides means you feel Rahelu's emotions more viscerally
Me, sharing my little epiphany in my writing group’s Discord.

Probably the most interesting and fun part of these later annotations is I get to reflect on decisions I made as a less experienced writer, since I’m doing them so long after the fact. Petition is a much better written book than my first “fix fic” novel is, and Supplicant, I hope, is just as much of an improvement upon Petition.

Looking back on this passage after having published the sequel, I think there’s still more distance than I would prefer, due to the self-consciousness in Rahelu’s narration that comes from the overt manner in how her thoughts are spelled out and structured. It still works, but that was the limit of where I was as a writer back then.

If I were to write this today, I think I would write it differently—be less clean and structured, elide more, change up sentence length and pacing, drop the distance, go further into free indirect speech, add more voice, etc. The last para in the introspection arc, right before Rahelu shifts her weight, is probably closest to the style and approach I would take now.

I wonder how much that will change, if I were to revisit this after publishing Book 3?


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *